User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (X11; Series60/2.1 Nokia7610/3.0415.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia7610 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 2.1Nokia7610mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 2.1 Symbian OS Series 60 2.1Nokia7610smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 3.0415.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 2.1close Nokia7610closeclosecloseclose0.022 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 7610closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 2.1Nokia7610mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:16 | by ThaDafinser