User agent detail

LinkedInBot/1.0 (compatible; Mozilla/5.0; Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/3.1 +http://www.linkedin.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesLinkedIn BotSocial Media Agent0 Detail
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
LinkedInBot 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesLinkedInBotBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesLinkedInBotclose0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LinkedInBot 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Jakarta Commons-HttpClient 3.1close software-librarycloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesLinkedIn BotSocial Media Agent0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesLinkedInBotclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Jakarta Commons HttpClient 3.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesLinkedin Botclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library Javaclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:21 | by ThaDafinser