User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; samsung gt-c6112) UCBrowser8.2.1.144/69/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsunggt-c6112closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.028 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close Samsunggt-c6112mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.2 Samsunggt-c6112smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.1close Samsunggt-c6112closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.2.1.144 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Samsunggt-c6112mobile:featureyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.2.1.144close Samsungc6112closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:20 | by ThaDafinser