User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (x86 [en] Windows NT 5.1; Sun)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Netscape 3.0Gecko unknownWinXP 5.1unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 3.0Gecko WinXP 5.1Desktop0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 3.0closeWinXP closecloseDesktopclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

HotJava 3.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows XPdesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 3.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 3.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 3.0 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Navigator 3.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:20 | by ThaDafinser