User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Window NT 6.2; Win64; x64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-811.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 12.16close closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 12.16close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 12.16Presto 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 12.16close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.16close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 12.16close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388 desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 12.16close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:18 | by ThaDafinser