User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060206 SeaMonkey/1.5a
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9a1closeWindows 5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko Windows 2000desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.5closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.5aGecko 20060206Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko 1.9a1Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:17 | by ThaDafinser