User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT; en; Preview) Gecko/20020603 Beonex/0.8-stable
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Beonex Communicator 0.8Gecko unknownWinNT unknownunknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Beonex Communicator 0.8Gecko WinNT Desktop0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Beonex 0.8-stablecloseWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Beonex 0.8Gecko Windows NTdesktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows NT closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Beonex 0.8-stablecloseWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 20020603Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.26302 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko Windows desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Beonex 0.8closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:14 | by ThaDafinser