User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; ; Intel Mac OS X; fr; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Opera
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.8.1.1closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Gecko 20061204Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.8.1OS X desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:13 | by ThaDafinser