User agent detail

Mozilla/4.08 (815SH;SoftBank) NetFront/3.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
NetFront 3.4 815SHmobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 3.4close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.4close Softbank815SHmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 3.4NetFront Softbanksmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.4 Sharp815SHmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 3.4close Softbank815SHFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.4close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:13 | by ThaDafinser