User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; NetPositive/2.1.1; BeOS)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
NetPositive 2.1.1closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 3.0Gecko Desktop0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 3.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetPositive 2.1.1closeBeOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetPositive 2.1 BeOS desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
NetPositive 2.1.1closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 3.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NetPositive 2.1.1closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 3.0 BeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetPositive 2.1.1 BeOS desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetPositive 2.1.1closeBeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:09 | by ThaDafinser