User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-os2.yaml
Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 2.0.1OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 4.0Gecko 2.0OS/2 Desktop0.029 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Firefox 4.0closeOS/2 closecloseDesktopclose0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Firefox 4.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firefox 4.0.1closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firefox 4.0Gecko OS/2 desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firefox 4.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 4.0.1close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Firefox 4.0.1closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Warpzilla 4.0.1Gecko 20100101OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 2.0.1OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firefox 4.0.1close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:12:09 | by ThaDafinser