User agent detail

YUANDA50_12864_11B_HW (MRE\2.5.00(800) resolution\320480 chipset\MT6250 touch\1 tpannel\1 camera\1 gsensor\0 keyboard\reduced) C529AH_JY_539_W1.11B.V2.2 Release/2012.09.26 WAP Browser/MAUI (HTTP PGDL; HTTPS) Profile/ Q03C1-2.40 fr-FR
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-378.php
MAUI Wap Browser 0.0unknown unknownJAVA unknownunknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
MAUI Wap Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.035 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
MAUI Wap Browser closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.077 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
YUANDA50 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 3closeMRE mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

MAUI based WAP Browsercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C MRE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:52 | by ThaDafinser