User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; U; en-US) Gecko/20081217 Vision-Browser/8.1 221x374 Pantech CDM8999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechCDM8999closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeBrew PantechCruxmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Vision Mobile Browser 8.1Gecko GNU/Linux AudiovoxCDM-8999smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux PantechCDM8999closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 20081217Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Novarra Vision 8.1Gecko Brew PantechCruxmobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux LGVN530Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:48 | by ThaDafinser