User agent detail

IC OpenGraph Crawler 4.5 (proprietary)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesIBM ConnectionsBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesIBM ConnectionsBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesIBM Connectionsclose0.004 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
IC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesIC OpenGraph Crawlerclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera ietaryclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:47 | by ThaDafinser