User agent detail

amaya/9.51 libwww/5.4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
Amaya 9.51 closeclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Amaya 9.0 Desktop0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Amaya 9.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
amaya 9.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Amaya 9.51close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Amaya 9.51 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Amaya 9.51close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesAmayaCrawler0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
W3C Amaya 9.51 closeclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Amaya 9.51close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:44 | by ThaDafinser