User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11) KHTML/4.11.2 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.11 SUSE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11.2 desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.11KHTML SUSE desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.11closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.11.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.11 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11.2 desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.11close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:44 | by ThaDafinser