User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; PL; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows ME closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.7.5closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.7.5closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.19901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows MEdesktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.7.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.7.5closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.7.5Gecko 20041217Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.7.5Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows Mecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:38 | by ThaDafinser