User agent detail

Opera/6.11 (UNIX; U) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Opera 6.11 Unix desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera Unix Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera closeUnix closecloseDesktopclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.11Presto 0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.11close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.11closeUnix closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.11 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.11 Unix desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.11closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.11closeUnix closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:38 | by ThaDafinser