User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html) Safari/537.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.09101 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesGoogle Botclose0.07 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 537.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesGoogleclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 537.4close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Googlebot 2.1WebKit 537.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesGooglebotclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:37 | by ThaDafinser