User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U;) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Iron
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 532.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.21501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Iron WebKit Windows desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 532.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Iron close closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

SRWare Iron WebKit 532.0Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 532.0Windows desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SRWare Iron closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:36 | by ThaDafinser