User agent detail

Mozilla/1.1N (X11; I; BSD/386 uname failed)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Netscape Navigator 1.1 BSD/OS desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 1.1closeBSD/OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.21801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.1Nclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 1.1 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 1.1N a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Navigator 1.1 BSD/OS desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:30 | by ThaDafinser