User agent detail

Ubuntu APT-HTTP/1.3 (0.7.20.2ubuntu6)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yesApt HTTP TransportBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesApt HTTP TransportBot/Crawler0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Ubuntu closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeUbuntu closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Ubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Ubuntu Web Browser 1.3 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:28 | by ThaDafinser