User agent detail

LG-G660/V100/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGG660closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
LG JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
LG closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-G660 V100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close LGG660mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGG660smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGG660closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGG660closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
LGG660mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGG660closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:25 | by ThaDafinser