User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.5 (like Gecko) (Exabot-Thumbnails)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesExaBotCrawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesExaleadBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesExaleadclose0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesExabotclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesExabot-Thumbnailsclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesExaBotCrawler0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesExabotclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 3.5.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 3.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesExabot Thumbnailsclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 3.5closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:24 | by ThaDafinser