User agent detail

LinkStar Research Crawler (http://linkstar.com/),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Research Crawler close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LinkStar closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesResearch Crawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Links close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:18 | by ThaDafinser