User agent detail

NOKIA-1682C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Nokia1682Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Nokia close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
NOKIA-1682C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeSeries40 Nokia1682 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Nokia Browser Symbian NokiaN1682Csmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia1682Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Nokia Browser Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Series40 Nokia1682 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Nokia Web Browser close Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:10 | by ThaDafinser