User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (;Samsung;SmartTV2013;T-FXPDEUC-1116.1;;) WebKit
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungSmart TV 2013tv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeSamsung 2013.0SamsungSmartTV2013closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SamsungSmart TV 2013televisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Maple Browser close Samsung Smart TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:11:08 | by ThaDafinser