User agent detail

UP.Browser/3.04-KC14 UP.Link/3.4.5.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-openwave.yaml
Openwave 3.04 A1012Kmobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
UP closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 3.04close SamsungSCH-6100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 3.04 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 3.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 3.04 KyoceraA1012Kmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungSCH-6100Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 3.04close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:57 | by ThaDafinser