User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Win32)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 8.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 8.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows 95desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 8.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 32 closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:53 | by ThaDafinser