User agent detail

SAMSUNG-B5722/B5722XXJA1, SAMSUNG-GT-B5722/B5722XXJA1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungB5722closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Samsung JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Samsung closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.055 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-B5722 B5722XXJA1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close SamsungB5722mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungGT-B5722smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungB5722closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SamsungB5722mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SamsungB5722closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:51 | by ThaDafinser