User agent detail

MOZILLA/40 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 60 WINDOWS CE PPC) ASUS-GALAXYII/10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close AsusGALAXYIIclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Edge 60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 60closeWindows AsusGalaxy IIdesktop-browsercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 60Trident Windows CE AsusGALAXYIIsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 60closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AsusGALAXYIIcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 60 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 60Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 60 Windows Mobile AsusGalaxy IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Galaxy IIcloseWindows CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:51 | by ThaDafinser