User agent detail

LG-BL20f Browser/Obigo-Q7.3 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGBL20fclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 7.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-BL20f closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGBL20mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGBL20fsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.3close LGBL20fcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 7.3 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.10901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGBL20fcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7.3 LGBL20fmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGBL20Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGBL20fcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:49 | by ThaDafinser