User agent detail

Feedfetcher-Google; (+http://www.google.com/feedfetcher.html; 375 subscribers; feed-id=15381863289700640853)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesGooglebotSearch bot0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesFeedfetcher-GoogleRSS0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesFeedfetcher-Googleclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Feedfetcher-Google closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Feedfetcher-Google close feed-readercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesFeedfetcher Googleclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesFeedFetcher-GoogleFeed Reader0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesGoogle Feedfetcherclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle Feedfetcherclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.024 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:41 | by ThaDafinser