User agent detail

Mozilla/6.0 (Macintosh; U; Amiga-AWeb) Safari 3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Amiga Aweb AmigaOS desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.023 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

AWeb closeMacOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Amiga Aweb AmigaOS desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 3.1 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
AWeb Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Amiga AWeb closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:37 | by ThaDafinser