User agent detail

HTTP_Request2/2.1.1 (http://pear.php.net/package/http_request2) PHP/5.3.10-1ubuntu3.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/misc.yaml
HTTP Library phpcloseUNKNOWN closeclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesPEAR HTTP_Request2Bot/Crawler0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesPEAR HTTP_Request2close0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HTTP closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeUbuntu closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

HTTP_Request2 2.1.1closeLinux software-librarycloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Ubuntu Web Browser 3.6 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

PHP 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesPHPclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library phpclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:35 | by ThaDafinser