User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL;TechnoTrend Goerler;S-855;3.1.8.24.04.20.devel;;) CE-HTML/1.0 hdplusinteraktiv/1.0 (NETRANGEMMH;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
TechnoTrendS-855tvcloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
S-855televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
TechnoTrendS-855tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close TechnoTrend GoerlerS-855closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
TechnoTrendS-855televisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
D+ interaktivclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:34 | by ThaDafinser