User agent detail

Mozilla/3.01 (compatible; Netbox/3.5 R92; Linux 2.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
NetBox 3.5closeGNU/Linux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netbox Linux SonyNetboxTV Device0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netbox closeLinux closecloseTV Deviceclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetBox 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 3.01closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 2.2closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 3.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 3.1 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Linux closeclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetBox 3.5closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:34 | by ThaDafinser