User agent detail

User-Agent: Mozilla/1.0N (X11; SunOS 4.1.1 sun4c)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Netscape Navigator 1.0 Solaris 1.0desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
User-Agent closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 1.0closeSolaris 1.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.21701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Solaris 4.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.0NcloseSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 1.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 1.0N SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Navigator 1.0 Solaris 1.0desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:30 | by ThaDafinser