User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; es-la; lg-gm360i) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/70/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGgm360iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.07501 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.062 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close LGgm360imobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.3 LGgm360ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close LGgm360icloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.3.0.154 LGLGgm360icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25002 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.3Gecko LGgm360imobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.3.0.154close LGgm360icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:30 | by ThaDafinser