User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.2 Version/1.0 Safari/532.2 Pixi/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PalmPixiclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 1.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari 1.0WebKit GNU/Linux PalmPixi 1.1smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari 1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 1.0closeLinux PalmPixicloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 532.2WebKit 532.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari 1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 532.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 532.2Linux closeclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 1.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari 1.0closeGNU/Linux Palm Pixicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:25 | by ThaDafinser