User agent detail

Opera/9.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS; de)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.0 Mac OS desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.0Presto 2.0 Desktop0.021 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.0closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.0Presto Mac desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.0close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.0 Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.0 Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.0closePPC Mac OS Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.0closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:18 | by ThaDafinser