User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; OSS/1.0; Chameleon; Linux) MOT-EM30/Imperfecto_Lite_v10.3 BER/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaEM30closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeLinux MotorolaEM30mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux MotorolaEM30smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux MotorolaEM30closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

5.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Linux MotorolaEM30mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet closeLinux MotorolaEM30Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux MotorolaEM30closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:18 | by ThaDafinser