User agent detail

SonyEricssonT280i/R1BA003 TelecaBrowser/Q04C1-1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonT280iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SonyEricssonT280i R1BA003closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 4close Sony EricssonT280imobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Sony EricssonT280ifeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonT280icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Sony EricssonSony Ericsson T280icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 4C Sony EricssonT280imobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SonyEricssonT280iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Browserclose SonyEricssonT280icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:14 | by ThaDafinser