User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (BREW 3.1.5; U; en-us; Sanyo; Polaris/6.0/AMB) Sprint SCP-2700
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SprintSCP-2700closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Polaris 6.0closeJVM SanyoSCP2700mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Polaris 6.0 Brew 3.1Sanyofeature phoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0closeBREW 3.1.5SprintSCP-2700closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Polaris 6.0 Brew 3.1.5mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SanyoSCP2700Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Polaris 6.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:14 | by ThaDafinser