User agent detail

MOT-W418G/06.14.00[TFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX] Obigo/Q03C MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaW418Gclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 3.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-W418G 06.14.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 3close MotorolaW418Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q03C MotorolaW418Gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close MotorolaW418Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 03 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q03C Browser Q03C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C MotorolaW418Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose MotorolaW418GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q03Cclose MotorolaW418Gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:12 | by ThaDafinser