User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S7070C/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/1.0 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-S7070Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-S7070C 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Dolfin 1.0closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Dolphin 1.0close SamsungGT-S7070Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Dolphin 1.0WebKit SamsungGT-S7070Csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.0close SamsungGT-S7070Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Dolfin 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dolfin 1.0 SamsungGT-S7070Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S7070CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Dolfin 1.0close SamsungGT-S7070Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:08 | by ThaDafinser