User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20110321 MultiZilla/4.33.2.6a SeaMonkey/8.6.55
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
MultiZilla 4.33.2.6acloseWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.0.7closeWindows 6.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 8.6.55closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 8.6Gecko Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 8.6.55closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 8.6.55closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.0.7closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 8.6.55closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 8.6.55Gecko 20110321Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 8.6.55Gecko 1.8.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
MultiZilla 4.33.2.6acloseWindows 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:05 | by ThaDafinser