User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx) AppleWebKit/525.1 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/525.1 ) midori/1.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 1.19Webkit 525.1Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Midori 1.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 525.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 525.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Midori 1.19WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 525.1WebKit 525.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Midori 1.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Midori 1.19WebKit 525.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Midori 1.19Webkit 525.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Midori 1.19closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:04 | by ThaDafinser