User agent detail

QuickTime/7.6.6 (qtver=7.6.6;cpu=IA32;os=Mac 10.6.8)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
QuickTime 7.6.6 Mac 10.6.8desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
QuickTime 7.6 MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
QuickTime 7.6closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
QuickTime 7.6.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

QuickTime 7.6.6closeMac OS media-playercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QuickTime 7.6 Mac 10.6desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QuickTime 7.6.6 Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:03 | by ThaDafinser