User agent detail

LAVA.KKT22S/Dorado WAP-Browser/1.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
Dorado WAP Browser 1.0unknown unknownJAVA unknownLavaKKT22SMobile Phoneyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Dorado WAP Browser 1.0 JAVA LavaKKT22SMobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Dorado WAP Browser 1.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LAVA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Dorado WAP-Browser 1.0.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dorado 1.0.0 closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:01 | by ThaDafinser